首页> 外文OA文献 >Nonprofit Displacement and the Pursuit of Charity Through Public Benefit Corporations
【2h】

Nonprofit Displacement and the Pursuit of Charity Through Public Benefit Corporations

机译:非营利性流离失所与公益事业对慈善事业的追求

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Nonprofits dominate the charitable sector. Until recently, this statement was tautological. Charity is increasingly being conducted through for-profit entities, raising concerns about the marketization of the charitable sector. This Article: examines for-profit charity conducted through the public benefit corporation, a new corporate form that allows its owners to blend mission and profit in a single entity. Proponents of public benefit corporations intended it as an alternative to a for-profit corporation and largely ignored its impact on the charitable sector. While public benefit corporations are ripe for conducting charity because they can pursue dual missions, they lack the transparency and accountability mechanisms of charitable organizations.This Article: chronicles the supply and demand for public benefit corporations that conduct charity (i.e., “charitable public benefit corporations”) and hypothesizes the micro and macro level harms caused by them. At the micro level, the harm is fraud or “greenwashing,” i.e., deceiving unwitting stockholders, customers, or other stakeholders into investing or spending their time and money in the negligent or fraudulent enterprise. At the macro level, the more pernicious harm is that “market-based charity” injects individualistic and autocratic business values and methods into charitable work. Proposals have been made to mitigate these harms, but none are satisfactory, making additional measures necessary.
机译:非营利组织主导着慈善部门。直到最近,这种说法都是重言式的。慈善越来越多地通过营利性实体进行,这引起了对慈善部门市场化的担忧。本文:探讨了通过公益组织进行的公益性慈善活动,公益组织是一种新的公司形式,允许其所有者将使命和利润融合在一个实体中。支持公益性公司的支持者打算将其作为营利性公司的替代方案,而在很大程度上忽略了其对慈善部门的影响。尽管公益性公司由于可以履行双重使命而进行慈善的时机已经成熟,但它们缺乏慈善组织的透明度和问责机制。 ”),并假设了它们造成的微观和宏观层面的危害。从微观上讲,危害是欺诈或“洗绿钱”,即欺骗不知情的股东,客户或其他利益相关者将其时间和金钱投资或花费在疏忽或欺诈的企业上。在宏观层面,更为有害的危害是“基于市场的慈善”将个人主义和专制的商业价值和方法注入慈善工作。已经提出减轻这些危害的建议,但是没有一个令人满意的,因此需要采取附加措施。

著录项

  • 作者

    Plerhoples, Alicia E.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2017
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号